The County should deny the Idaho-Maryland Mine and should not certify the Final EIR
Library
Browse through or search our library of expert and community articles, presentations, and opinion pieces.
The views and opinions expressed here are those of the original creators and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CEA Foundation or the MineWatch campaign.


David Briceno: Negative aspects of proposed mine considered

Peter Burnes: Enough gold for 600 years

John Vaughan, The mine: It’s not about economics, it’s about risk

Jim Steinmann: Mine jobs – Harsh, few, and not for locals

Ray Bryars: Economic Impact Report

Jeff Kane: Mine's economic report shows County's lack of due diligence

Press Release: Community Weighs in on Mine’s Economic Report

Questionable Economic Return

Learn About the County's Economic Impact Report

Press Release: CEA Foundation Urges Caution Interpreting Mine’s Economic Impact Report

CEA Foundation: Economic Impact Report Questions

Paul Schwartz: Mine’s unintended consequences not mentioned

Terry Lamphier: Mine our green, not our gold

Terry McLaughlin: Still not convinced mine should reopen

★ 312 Jobs? Not What It Seems. Look Closer.

★ A close look at Rise Gold's Job Claims

★ Rise Gold Investors Beware: Idaho-Maryland Mine Unlikely Before 2034

★ Martin Webb: Analyzing the Idaho-Maryland Fudge Factory

Energy ROI: We Can Do Better - Martin Webb

★ Bob Clark: Property Values At Risk

Request for Economic Study of Mine Impacts